CALIBRATE BASEBALLBack to the recordgame prep, generated 2026-07-29 22:03 UTC
New York Yankees at Chicago White Sox
2026-07-29, 7:40 PM ET, Rate Field.
Davis Martin (R) against
Cam Schlittler (R).
Every number derives from the public Statcast store and the engine's published
boards. Charts are code-drawn. Probabilities, not picks. Statcast through 2026-07-28.
What decides tonight
Every number below is a probability this engine published before first pitch and grades that night, or a plain count. No scouting verdicts are ranked here — those live in the panels and carry their own sample sizes.
1Their bats highest board probability Ben Rice 21%. see the grid
2Run environment board total 8.53, P(over 8.5) 46%. Clears its pre-registered floor only; not distinguishable from climatology, and carries a documented −0.29-run level bias.
Pen posture Us: 1 threw 35+ last time. New York Yankees: 3 on back-to-back days, 1 threw 35+ last time. see bullpens
Our bats highest board probability Miguel Vargas 63%, lowest Drew Romo 46% (17 points of spread across the nine). see the grid
Air 72°F · 4 mph blowing out to center · air 2.8% thinner than a neutral sea-level night. Shown as conditions, not as an edge: this engine's weather layer measured a CRPS change of −0.003 on the runs backtest, which is not distinguishable from zero.
Cam Schlittler (RHP)
2020 pitches, K% 33% vs LHB (312 BF) / 27% vs RHB (203 BF)
22 apps · median 23 BF · reaches the order 3.0× (max 4) · exits at 94 pitches (IQR 85–99, 22 starts) · fastball -0.7 mph late (17 deep starts). Fade is measured inside each start on nights that reached 85 pitches, so it is not flattered by the short outings.
League percentiles, starter pool
K%9430%
BB%945%
CSW%6128%
Whiff%6625%
Chase%9035%
xwOBA vs91.269
Hard-hit%4439%
GB%5744%
1st-pitch strike%6864%
published K forecast: E[K] 5.9
recent starts, K (n=5)
506/30 DET
807/06 TB
607/11 WSH
807/19 LAD
1207/24 PHI
Arsenal, shape and results
Pitch
#
vL%
vR%
MPH
IVB
HB
RPM
Whiff
CSW
Chase
2K use
2K zone
xwOBA
RV/100
4-seam
893
50%
35%
97.8
+17
-5
2503
31%
31%
38%
45%
39%
.242
-1.7
cutter
542
27%
26%
94.6
+10
+6
2563
20%
25%
35%
23%
44%
.303
-0.3
sinker
398
13%
31%
97.7
+11
-14
2334
13%
26%
32%
21%
53%
.258
-1.5
curveball
155
10%
4%
85.4
-11
+6
2533
37%
29%
33%
9%
21%
.339
+0.9
RV/100 is run value per 100 pitches from the pitcher's
side, so negative is good (a curveball at −1.3 costs the
pitcher runs even if it misses bats — a real tension worth reading, not a
contradiction). Whiff, chase and xwOBA are computed on this pitcher's own
pitches this season; low-usage pitches carry small samples.
Locations, catcher view
4-seamcuttersinker
Movement
How to attack
Lay off the curveball below the zone: 37% whiffs, only 32% of them are strikes.
Vs righties he leans sinker (31% of pitches to that side).
Hunt the sinker early: 22% of his first pitches, only 13% whiffs, 58% in-zone on 0-0.
Davis Martin (RHP)
1780 pitches, K% 20% vs LHB (268 BF) / 24% vs RHB (195 BF)
20 apps · median 23 BF · reaches the order 3.0× (max 3) · exits at 88 pitches (IQR 85–93, 20 starts) · fastball -0.2 mph late (14 deep starts). Fade is measured inside each start on nights that reached 85 pitches, so it is not flattered by the short outings.
League percentiles, starter pool
K%4322%
BB%677%
CSW%3126%
Whiff%4222%
Chase%7533%
xwOBA vs46.320
Hard-hit%1544%
GB%5543%
1st-pitch strike%1457%
published K forecast: E[K] 4.7
recent starts, K (n=5)
306/27 KC
007/02 CLE
207/08 BOS
507/18 TOR
307/24 HOU
Arsenal, shape and results
Pitch
#
vL%
vR%
MPH
IVB
HB
RPM
Whiff
CSW
Chase
2K use
2K zone
xwOBA
RV/100
4-seam
454
29%
22%
94.1
+14
-5
2413
21%
24%
28%
30%
42%
.310
+0.4
sinker
326
15%
24%
92.8
+8
-14
2397
7%
22%
26%
12%
60%
.352
-1.6
changeup
247
18%
8%
90.3
+1
-14
2122
13%
19%
38%
16%
40%
.325
-2.3
slider
243
5%
27%
87.2
+1
+5
2603
38%
30%
48%
20%
26%
.252
-0.3
curveball
240
16%
10%
81.8
-8
+14
2879
38%
30%
29%
13%
33%
.241
-0.1
cutter
238
16%
9%
89.7
+7
+2
2577
25%
32%
29%
9%
56%
.419
+0.2
RV/100 is run value per 100 pitches from the pitcher's
side, so negative is good (a curveball at −1.3 costs the
pitcher runs even if it misses bats — a real tension worth reading, not a
contradiction). Whiff, chase and xwOBA are computed on this pitcher's own
pitches this season; low-usage pitches carry small samples.
Locations and movement (4 charts)
4-seamsinkerchangeup
Movement
Attack plan vs New York Yankees
Slider/curveball: top breaking whiffs are McMahon (41%), Jones (41%).
Changeup: top offspeed whiffs are Jones (55%), Wells (47%).
Careful with Grisham: 84% contact, 15% K rate vs RHP; pitch to contact at the edges.
White Sox bats vs Cam Schlittler
Season quality vs tonight's starter hand, percentile-colored vs league: red elite, paper average, blue poor. P columns are the engine's published board numbers for this game. Batting order as posted. 30d contact is the last-30-day contact rate minus the season rate; an arrow is drawn only when the move clears two standard errors of its own noise, and n is the recent swing count.
#
Batter
PA
xwOBA
K%
Chase%
Contact%
HH%
P(1+ hit)
P(1+ HR)
30d contact
1
Sam Antonacci (L)
273
.383
14%
22%
88%
39%
59%
12%
≈ n176
2
Munetaka Murakami (L)
214
.407
31%
22%
60%
59%
56%
20%
≈ n101
3
Miguel Vargas (R)
318
.372
18%
22%
81%
41%
63%
17%
≈ n197
4
Colson Montgomery (L)
290
.313
32%
32%
65%
45%
58%
14%
≈ n178
5
Andrew Benintendi (L)
285
.324
23%
30%
75%
47%
54%
8%
≈ n138
6
Braden Montgomery (S)
119
.334
17%
28%
78%
42%
58%
8%
≈ n196
7
Tristan Peters (L)
279
.313
18%
35%
81%
34%
57%
10%
≈ n160
8
Chase Meidroth (R)
310
.294
25%
27%
81%
34%
60%
11%
≈ n171
9
Drew Romo (S)
110
.237
25%
33%
69%
25%
46%
8%
≈ n60
New York Yankees bats, where our staff attacks
Whiff by pitch group vs our starter's hand. Blue cells are the attack zones. P columns are the published board numbers. Batting order as posted. 30d contact is the last-30-day contact rate minus the season rate; an arrow is drawn only when the move clears two standard errors of its own noise, and n is the recent swing count.
#
Batter
PA
FB whiff
BRK whiff
OFF whiff
xwOBA
Chase%
Contact%
1st-pitch swing
P(1+ hit)
P(1+ HR)
30d contact
1
Trent Grisham (L)
249
11%
21%
27%
.355
18%
84%
28% n250
62%
13%
≈ n157
2
Ben Rice (L)
286
14%
29%
30%
.403
24%
78%
30% n286
64%
21%
≈ n186
3
Jasson Domínguez (S)
113
10%
24%
38%
.302
37%
79%
39% n113
64%
12%
≈ n183
4
Paul Goldschmidt (R)
166
28%
28%
29%
.258
40%
72%
40% n166
60%
15%
▼ -8% n135
5
Spencer Jones (L)
75
39%
41%
55%
.285
35%
59%
·
49%
9%
▼ -13% n49
6
Jazz Chisholm Jr. (L)
265
18%
36%
35%
.331
28%
74%
29% n266
63%
16%
≈ n162
7
Ryan McMahon (L)
196
22%
41%
33%
.310
30%
71%
29% n198
55%
15%
≈ n89
8
José Caballero (R)
217
17%
31%
23%
.264
36%
78%
29% n217
61%
10%
≈ n167
9
Austin Wells (L)
167
15%
41%
47%
.333
27%
72%
35% n167
54%
13%
≈ n91
New York Yankees hitters, one card each
One card per hitter: the published probabilities this engine grades tonight, his whiff shape by pitch group, and his season against this starter's hand with the sample stated. Times-through-order and leverage splits are deliberately absent — at a median 45 plate appearances the third-time-through number carries a standard error roughly three times the effect it would be claiming.
1
Trent Grisham (L)
P(1+ hit) 62% · P(1+ HR) 13%
FB11%
BRK21%
OFF27%
vs RHP 0.355 xwOBA, K 15% (249 PA)
2
Ben Rice (L)
P(1+ hit) 64% · P(1+ HR) 21%
FB14%
BRK29%
OFF30%
vs RHP 0.403 xwOBA, K 23% (286 PA)
3
Jasson Domínguez (S)
P(1+ hit) 64% · P(1+ HR) 12%
FB10%
BRK24%
OFF38%
vs RHP 0.302 xwOBA, K 19% (113 PA)
4
Paul Goldschmidt (R)
P(1+ hit) 60% · P(1+ HR) 15%
FB28%
BRK28%
OFF29%
vs RHP 0.258 xwOBA, K 27% (166 PA)
5
Spencer Jones (L)
P(1+ hit) 49% · P(1+ HR) 9%
FB39%
BRK41%
OFF55%
vs RHP 0.285 xwOBA, K 41% (75 PA)
6
Jazz Chisholm Jr. (L)
P(1+ hit) 63% · P(1+ HR) 16%
FB18%
BRK36%
OFF35%
vs RHP 0.331 xwOBA, K 28% (265 PA)
7
Ryan McMahon (L)
P(1+ hit) 55% · P(1+ HR) 15%
FB22%
BRK41%
OFF33%
vs RHP 0.310 xwOBA, K 31% (196 PA)
8
José Caballero (R)
P(1+ hit) 61% · P(1+ HR) 10%
FB17%
BRK31%
OFF23%
vs RHP 0.264 xwOBA, K 20% (217 PA)
9
Austin Wells (L)
P(1+ hit) 54% · P(1+ HR) 13%
FB15%
BRK41%
OFF47%
vs RHP 0.333 xwOBA, K 26% (167 PA)
Matchups: CWS hitters vs Cam Schlittler
Where this starter's actual usage meets each hitter's
measured holes and damage, on the same map. An edge is only reported
where the pitcher genuinely goes — a hole against a pitch he does not
throw is not a matchup — and only where the rate is measurably worse than
league for a typical hitter in that same spot. Every line carries its
sample size. Batter-versus-pitcher history is shown as trivia and
is not used in any of it: the samples that actually occur are
far too small to support a conclusion, and most public matchup content is
built on them anyway.
1. Sam Antonacci
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes up and away — and he puts 8% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.437 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.274 league average in that spot. (13 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 59% to get a hit and 12% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
2. Munetaka Murakami
Edge: pitcherHe throws the four-seam off the plate on 25% of his pitches to this side. The batter swings and misses 47% of the time there, against 31% for a typical hitter — +16 points. (23 swings.)
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes middle-middle — and he puts 7% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.706 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.396 league average in that spot. (18 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 56% to get a hit and 20% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
3. Miguel Vargas
Edge: pitcherHe throws the sinker up-middle on 4% of his pitches to this side. The batter swings and misses 17% of the time there, against 12% for a typical hitter — +5 points. (16 swings.)
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes middle-middle — and he puts 5% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.507 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.396 league average in that spot. (24 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 63% to get a hit and 17% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
4. Colson Montgomery
Edge: pitcherHe throws the four-seam off the plate on 25% of his pitches to this side. The batter swings and misses 45% of the time there, against 31% for a typical hitter — +14 points. (62 swings.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 58% to get a hit and 14% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
5. Andrew Benintendi
Edge: pitcherHe throws the four-seam up-middle on 5% of his pitches to this side. The batter swings and misses 24% of the time there, against 18% for a typical hitter — +6 points. (24 swings.)
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes up-middle — and he puts 10% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.419 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.333 league average in that spot. (15 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 54% to get a hit and 8% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
6. Braden Montgomery
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes middle-middle — and he puts 7% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.528 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.396 league average in that spot. (14 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 58% to get a hit and 8% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
7. Tristan Peters
Edge: pitcherHe throws the four-seam middle-middle on 5% of his pitches to this side. The batter swings and misses 20% of the time there, against 11% for a typical hitter — +9 points. (21 swings.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 57% to get a hit and 10% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
8. Chase Meidroth
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes middle and away — and he puts 7% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.378 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.310 league average in that spot. (19 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 60% to get a hit and 11% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
9. Drew Romo
Not enough of a track record in the spots this pitcher uses to say anything useful. No verdict rather than a guess.
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 46% to get a hit and 8% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
New York Yankees: the running game and the defense
Sprint speed says who can run; attempt rate says who
will. Rate is steals of second per time on first, shrunk toward the
league’s 5.3% at 20 opportunities, with the raw count beside
it. Verdict needs 15+ times on first. Sprint speed and Outs Above Average are
Baseball Savant leaderboard metrics — measured from tracking data we do
not have and did not compute.
Behind the plate: Drew Romo — runners went 26-for-34 against him (24% caught). That is mostly the pitcher: measured split-half reliability for a catcher’s own caught-stealing rate is +0.59, and the spread between catchers is smaller than the sampling noise. Read it as what happened, not as a rating.
#
Batter
Sprint
Steal rate
Threat
OAA
1
Trent Grisham (L)
26.7 ft/s
2.7% (9/354)
holds
-2 CF
2
Ben Rice (L)
26.7 ft/s
1.0% (2/291)
holds
-5 1B
3
Jasson Domínguez (S)
28.5 ft/s
10.2% (23/215)
occasional
·
4
Paul Goldschmidt (R)
25.4 ft/s
2.5% (6/262)
holds
+4 1B
5
Spencer Jones (L)
28.5 ft/s
1.9% (0/36)
holds
·
6
Jazz Chisholm Jr. (L)
28.4 ft/s
15.1% (49/311)
runner
+9 2B
7
Ryan McMahon (L)
25.9 ft/s
2.2% (5/254)
holds
+2 3B
8
José Caballero (R)
28.0 ft/s
21.9% (56/240)
runner
-3 SS
9
Austin Wells (L)
25.7 ft/s
1.9% (3/199)
holds
·
Chicago White Sox: the running game and the defense
Sprint speed says who can run; attempt rate says who
will. Rate is steals of second per time on first, shrunk toward the
league’s 5.3% at 20 opportunities, with the raw count beside
it. Verdict needs 15+ times on first. Sprint speed and Outs Above Average are
Baseball Savant leaderboard metrics — measured from tracking data we do
not have and did not compute.
#
Batter
Sprint
Steal rate
Threat
OAA
1
Sam Antonacci (L)
28.2 ft/s
9.5% (14/139)
occasional
-5 LF
2
Munetaka Murakami (L)
27.1 ft/s
2.7% (3/129)
holds
+0 1B
3
Miguel Vargas (R)
28.3 ft/s
4.3% (14/327)
holds
-2 3B
4
Colson Montgomery (L)
26.6 ft/s
1.0% (1/195)
holds
+6 SS
5
Andrew Benintendi (L)
26.6 ft/s
0.8% (1/238)
holds
·
6
Braden Montgomery (S)
28.5 ft/s
3.0% (1/48)
holds
·
7
Tristan Peters (L)
28.7 ft/s
4.0% (4/106)
holds
+9 CF
8
Chase Meidroth (R)
27.2 ft/s
3.5% (13/387)
holds
+4 2B
9
Drew Romo (S)
26.1 ft/s
4.0% (1/32)
holds
·
Bullpens
Sorted by 30-day workload. Day cells show pitches on the three
most recent league game dates; dark means heavy recent use. Season rates
percentile-colored vs all pitchers with 150+ pitches.