CALIBRATE BASEBALLBack to the recordgame prep, generated 2026-08-05 23:04 UTC
Chicago White Sox at Boston Red Sox
2026-08-05, 7:10 PM ET, Fenway Park.
Sean Burke (R) against
Sonny Gray (R).
Every number derives from the public Statcast store and the engine's published
boards. Charts are code-drawn. Probabilities, not picks. Statcast through 2026-08-04.
What decides tonight
Every number below is a probability this engine published before first pitch and grades that night, or a plain count. No scouting verdicts are ranked here — those live in the panels and carry their own sample sizes.
1Their bats highest board probability Wilyer Abreu 22%. see the grid
2Our bats highest board probability Sam Antonacci 68%, lowest Drew Romo 49% (19 points of spread across the nine). see the grid
3Run environment board total 8.75, P(over 8.5) 48%. Clears its pre-registered floor only; not distinguishable from climatology, and carries a documented −0.29-run level bias.
Pen posture Us: 1 threw 35+ last time. Boston Red Sox: 1 on back-to-back days, 1 threw 35+ last time. see bullpens
Their starterSonny Gray, board E[K] 4.5 — 20 apps, median 23 BF.
Air 83°F · 7 mph blowing out to center · air 2.8% thinner than a neutral sea-level night. Shown as conditions, not as an edge: this engine's weather layer measured a CRPS change of −0.003 on the runs backtest, which is not distinguishable from zero.
Sonny Gray (RHP)
1655 pitches, K% 22% vs LHB (296 BF) / 20% vs RHB (166 BF)
20 apps · median 23 BF · reaches the order 3.0× (max 4) · exits at 88 pitches (IQR 77–91, 20 starts) · fastball -0.2 mph late (10 deep starts). Fade is measured inside each start on nights that reached 85 pitches, so it is not flattered by the short outings.
League percentiles, starter pool
K%4121%
BB%786%
CSW%4727%
Whiff%3121%
Chase%7533%
xwOBA vs60.306
Hard-hit%4938%
GB%7848%
1st-pitch strike%6964%
published K forecast: E[K] 4.5
recent starts, K (n=5)
707/04 LAA
307/10 NYM
507/19 TB
307/25 TOR
507/30 ATH
Arsenal, shape and results
Pitch
#
vL%
vR%
MPH
IVB
HB
RPM
Whiff
CSW
Chase
2K use
2K zone
xwOBA
RV/100
sinker
340
14%
34%
92.1
+7
-11
2349
12%
26%
20%
27%
58%
.261
-2.5
cutter
331
16%
27%
88.3
+3
+4
2624
15%
27%
31%
6%
72%
.369
+0.5
sweeper
323
16%
26%
84.9
-5
+14
2672
37%
24%
47%
48%
21%
.216
-1.4
4-seam
299
23%
9%
91.7
+11
+1
2464
11%
28%
25%
6%
58%
.389
-1.3
curveball
270
23%
4%
79.7
-14
+13
2592
30%
33%
33%
12%
32%
.341
+2.3
changeup
89
8%
0%
86.1
+4
-13
1712
10%
18%
25%
1%
·
.301
+0.5
RV/100 is run value per 100 pitches from the pitcher's
side, so negative is good (a curveball at −1.3 costs the
pitcher runs even if it misses bats — a real tension worth reading, not a
contradiction). Whiff, chase and xwOBA are computed on this pitcher's own
pitches this season; low-usage pitches carry small samples.
Locations, catcher view
sinkercuttersweeper
Movement
How to attack
Two strikes: expect the sweeper (48% of 2-strike pitches vs 20% overall).
Lay off the sweeper below the zone: 37% whiffs, only 25% of them are strikes.
Vs righties he leans sinker (34% of pitches to that side).
Sean Burke (RHP)
2000 pitches, K% 27% vs LHB (312 BF) / 28% vs RHB (197 BF)
22 apps · median 23 BF · reaches the order 3.0× (max 3) · exits at 92 pitches (IQR 90–97, 18 starts) · fastball -0.1 mph late (19 deep starts). Fade is measured inside each start on nights that reached 85 pitches, so it is not flattered by the short outings.
League percentiles, starter pool
K%8228%
BB%657%
CSW%8029%
Whiff%5123%
Chase%7432%
xwOBA vs75.291
Hard-hit%6636%
GB%2036%
1st-pitch strike%7264%
published K forecast: E[K] 6.1
recent starts, K (n=5)
1107/04 CLE
907/10 ATH
507/19 TOR
1007/25 HOU
1007/30 NYY
Arsenal, shape and results
Pitch
#
vL%
vR%
MPH
IVB
HB
RPM
Whiff
CSW
Chase
2K use
2K zone
xwOBA
RV/100
4-seam
743
40%
33%
94.9
+19
-5
2584
23%
27%
36%
50%
43%
.274
-1.3
knuckle-curve
419
26%
13%
79.6
-14
+5
2451
26%
32%
27%
22%
39%
.253
-0.2
slider
371
11%
31%
86.9
+4
+6
2526
31%
36%
34%
16%
40%
.295
-0.6
sinker
298
12%
20%
94.7
+15
-13
2399
10%
22%
30%
8%
45%
.373
+0.5
cutter
122
8%
2%
90.6
+11
+3
2660
32%
37%
37%
2%
·
.241
-2.2
RV/100 is run value per 100 pitches from the pitcher's
side, so negative is good (a curveball at −1.3 costs the
pitcher runs even if it misses bats — a real tension worth reading, not a
contradiction). Whiff, chase and xwOBA are computed on this pitcher's own
pitches this season; low-usage pitches carry small samples.
Locations and movement (4 charts)
4-seamknuckle-curveslider
Movement
Attack plan vs Boston Red Sox
Knuckle-curve/slider: top breaking whiffs are Duran (42%), Contreras (41%).
Careful with Yoshida: 87% contact, 10% K rate vs RHP; pitch to contact at the edges.
White Sox bats vs Sonny Gray
Season quality vs tonight's starter hand, percentile-colored vs league: red elite, paper average, blue poor. P columns are the engine's published board numbers for this game. Batting order as posted. 30d contact is the last-30-day contact rate minus the season rate; an arrow is drawn only when the move clears two standard errors of its own noise, and n is the recent swing count.
#
Batter
PA
xwOBA
K%
Chase%
Contact%
HH%
P(1+ hit)
P(1+ HR)
30d contact
1
Sam Antonacci (L)
294
.373
14%
22%
88%
40%
68%
10%
≈ n158
2
Munetaka Murakami (L)
231
.407
31%
22%
60%
61%
58%
21%
≈ n152
3
Miguel Vargas (R)
337
.374
18%
22%
80%
41%
66%
16%
▼ -6% n188
4
Colson Montgomery (L)
310
.304
34%
33%
65%
44%
62%
13%
≈ n171
5
Andrew Benintendi (L)
301
.331
22%
31%
75%
48%
62%
10%
≈ n126
6
Braden Montgomery (S)
133
.320
18%
30%
76%
41%
61%
8%
≈ n175
7
Tristan Peters (L)
297
.309
19%
34%
80%
33%
61%
9%
≈ n150
8
Chase Meidroth (R)
327
.294
24%
26%
82%
33%
64%
11%
≈ n158
9
Drew Romo (S)
120
.229
28%
34%
68%
25%
49%
4%
≈ n69
Boston Red Sox bats, where our staff attacks
Whiff by pitch group vs our starter's hand. Blue cells are the attack zones. P columns are the published board numbers. Batting order as posted. 30d contact is the last-30-day contact rate minus the season rate; an arrow is drawn only when the move clears two standard errors of its own noise, and n is the recent swing count.
#
Batter
PA
FB whiff
BRK whiff
OFF whiff
xwOBA
Chase%
Contact%
1st-pitch swing
P(1+ hit)
P(1+ HR)
30d contact
1
Nick Sogard (S)
46
11%
35%
22%
.315
22%
80%
·
59%
8%
≈ n42
2
Ceddanne Rafaela (R)
321
17%
25%
30%
.296
41%
79%
38% n321
68%
17%
≈ n246
3
Wilyer Abreu (L)
329
18%
27%
27%
.339
33%
79%
30% n329
67%
22%
≈ n209
4
Willson Contreras (R)
315
21%
41%
45%
.370
35%
70%
41% n316
60%
18%
≈ n136
5
Masataka Yoshida (L)
231
8%
21%
18%
.319
29%
87%
21% n231
62%
9%
≈ n123
6
Caleb Durbin (R)
287
9%
21%
27%
.280
28%
87%
31% n287
61%
8%
≈ n182
7
Jarren Duran (L)
334
26%
42%
34%
.293
36%
69%
26% n334
62%
10%
▲ +6% n186
8
Andruw Monasterio (R)
133
11%
22%
35%
.271
30%
84%
20% n133
65%
13%
≈ n140
9
Connor Wong (R)
118
18%
37%
·
.285
32%
74%
25% n118
53%
7%
≈ n102
Boston Red Sox hitters, one card each
One card per hitter: the published probabilities this engine grades tonight, his whiff shape by pitch group, and his season against this starter's hand with the sample stated. Times-through-order and leverage splits are deliberately absent — at a median 45 plate appearances the third-time-through number carries a standard error roughly three times the effect it would be claiming.
1
Nick Sogard (S)
P(1+ hit) 59% · P(1+ HR) 8%
FB11%
BRK35%
OFF22%
vs RHP 0.315 xwOBA, K 15% (46 PA)
2
Ceddanne Rafaela (R)
P(1+ hit) 68% · P(1+ HR) 17%
FB17%
BRK25%
OFF30%
vs RHP 0.296 xwOBA, K 18% (321 PA)
3
Wilyer Abreu (L)
P(1+ hit) 67% · P(1+ HR) 22%
FB18%
BRK27%
OFF27%
vs RHP 0.339 xwOBA, K 23% (329 PA)
4
Willson Contreras (R)
P(1+ hit) 60% · P(1+ HR) 18%
FB21%
BRK41%
OFF45%
vs RHP 0.370 xwOBA, K 28% (315 PA)
5
Masataka Yoshida (L)
P(1+ hit) 62% · P(1+ HR) 9%
FB8%
BRK21%
OFF18%
vs RHP 0.319 xwOBA, K 10% (231 PA)
6
Caleb Durbin (R)
P(1+ hit) 61% · P(1+ HR) 8%
FB9%
BRK21%
OFF27%
vs RHP 0.280 xwOBA, K 14% (287 PA)
7
Jarren Duran (L)
P(1+ hit) 62% · P(1+ HR) 10%
FB26%
BRK42%
OFF34%
vs RHP 0.293 xwOBA, K 30% (334 PA)
8
Andruw Monasterio (R)
P(1+ hit) 65% · P(1+ HR) 13%
FB11%
BRK22%
OFF35%
vs RHP 0.271 xwOBA, K 22% (133 PA)
9
Connor Wong (R)
P(1+ hit) 53% · P(1+ HR) 7%
FB18%
BRK37%
OFF·
vs RHP 0.285 xwOBA, K 26% (118 PA)
Matchups: CWS hitters vs Sonny Gray
Where this starter's actual usage meets each hitter's
measured holes and damage, on the same map. An edge is only reported
where the pitcher genuinely goes — a hole against a pitch he does not
throw is not a matchup — and only where the rate is measurably worse than
league for a typical hitter in that same spot. Every line carries its
sample size. Batter-versus-pitcher history is shown as trivia and
is not used in any of it: the samples that actually occur are
far too small to support a conclusion, and most public matchup content is
built on them anyway.
1. Sam Antonacci
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes down and in — and he puts 7% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.379 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.321 league average in that spot. (12 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 68% to get a hit and 10% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
2. Munetaka Murakami
Edge: pitcherHe throws the four-seam off the plate on 10% of his pitches to this side. The batter swings and misses 46% of the time there, against 31% for a typical hitter — +15 points. (26 swings.)
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes middle-middle — and he puts 6% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.670 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.397 league average in that spot. (21 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 58% to get a hit and 21% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
3. Miguel Vargas
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes middle-middle — and he puts 8% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.547 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.397 league average in that spot. (26 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 66% to get a hit and 16% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
4. Colson Montgomery
Edge: pitcherHe throws the four-seam off the plate on 10% of his pitches to this side. The batter swings and misses 45% of the time there, against 31% for a typical hitter — +14 points. (68 swings.)
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes down-middle — and he puts 8% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.552 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.358 league average in that spot. (18 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 62% to get a hit and 13% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
5. Andrew Benintendi
Edge: pitcherHe throws the four-seam up-middle on 2% of his pitches to this side. The batter swings and misses 23% of the time there, against 18% for a typical hitter — +5 points. (26 swings.)
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes middle-middle — and he puts 6% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.458 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.397 league average in that spot. (28 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 62% to get a hit and 10% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
6. Braden Montgomery
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes middle-middle — and he puts 6% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.495 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.397 league average in that spot. (15 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 61% to get a hit and 8% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
7. Tristan Peters
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes down and away — and he puts 5% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.296 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.260 league average in that spot. (15 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 61% to get a hit and 9% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
8. Chase Meidroth
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes middle and away — and he puts 8% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.366 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.309 league average in that spot. (20 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 64% to get a hit and 11% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
9. Drew Romo
Not enough of a track record in the spots this pitcher uses to say anything useful. No verdict rather than a guess.
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 49% to get a hit and 4% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
Boston Red Sox: the running game and the defense
Sprint speed says who can run; attempt rate says who
will. Rate is steals of second per time on first, shrunk toward the
league’s 5.3% at 20 opportunities, with the raw count beside
it. Verdict needs 15+ times on first. Sprint speed and Outs Above Average are
Baseball Savant leaderboard metrics — measured from tracking data we do
not have and did not compute.
Behind the plate: Drew Romo — runners went 28-for-36 against him (22% caught). That is mostly the pitcher: measured split-half reliability for a catcher’s own caught-stealing rate is +0.59, and the spread between catchers is smaller than the sampling noise. Read it as what happened, not as a rating.
#
Batter
Sprint
Steal rate
Threat
OAA
1
Nick Sogard (S)
28.1 ft/s
3.7% (2/63)
holds
·
2
Ceddanne Rafaela (R)
29.1 ft/s
11.6% (39/324)
occasional
+12 CF
3
Wilyer Abreu (L)
28.1 ft/s
6.6% (18/268)
occasional
+5 RF
4
Willson Contreras (R)
27.2 ft/s
2.9% (10/366)
holds
+0 1B
5
Masataka Yoshida (L)
26.2 ft/s
3.2% (5/168)
holds
·
6
Caleb Durbin (R)
28.0 ft/s
8.4% (25/292)
occasional
+3 3B
7
Jarren Duran (L)
29.1 ft/s
12.0% (42/340)
occasional
+7 LF
8
Andruw Monasterio (R)
27.0 ft/s
5.7% (6/104)
holds
-6 SS
9
Connor Wong (R)
27.3 ft/s
5.0% (7/141)
holds
·
Chicago White Sox: the running game and the defense
Sprint speed says who can run; attempt rate says who
will. Rate is steals of second per time on first, shrunk toward the
league’s 5.3% at 20 opportunities, with the raw count beside
it. Verdict needs 15+ times on first. Sprint speed and Outs Above Average are
Baseball Savant leaderboard metrics — measured from tracking data we do
not have and did not compute.
Behind the plate: Connor Wong — runners went 50-for-60 against him (17% caught). That is mostly the pitcher: measured split-half reliability for a catcher’s own caught-stealing rate is +0.59, and the spread between catchers is smaller than the sampling noise. Read it as what happened, not as a rating.
#
Batter
Sprint
Steal rate
Threat
OAA
1
Sam Antonacci (L)
28.2 ft/s
9.6% (15/147)
occasional
-5 LF
2
Munetaka Murakami (L)
27.1 ft/s
2.5% (3/141)
holds
+0 1B
3
Miguel Vargas (R)
28.3 ft/s
4.3% (14/333)
holds
-2 3B
4
Colson Montgomery (L)
26.6 ft/s
1.0% (1/197)
holds
+6 SS
5
Andrew Benintendi (L)
26.6 ft/s
0.8% (1/241)
holds
·
6
Braden Montgomery (S)
28.5 ft/s
2.8% (1/53)
holds
·
7
Tristan Peters (L)
28.7 ft/s
4.7% (5/110)
holds
+9 CF
8
Chase Meidroth (R)
27.2 ft/s
3.4% (13/399)
holds
+4 2B
9
Drew Romo (S)
26.1 ft/s
3.8% (1/34)
holds
·
Bullpens
Sorted by 30-day workload. Day cells show pitches on the three
most recent league game dates; dark means heavy recent use. Season rates
percentile-colored vs all pitchers with 150+ pitches.