CALIBRATE BASEBALLBack to the recordgame prep, generated 2026-08-14 22:34 UTC
Chicago White Sox at Detroit Tigers
2026-08-14, 6:40 PM ET, Comerica Park.
Sean Newcomb (L) against
Jackson Jobe (R).
Every number derives from the public Statcast store and the engine's published
boards. Charts are code-drawn. Probabilities, not picks. Statcast through 2026-08-13.
What decides tonight
Every number below is a probability this engine published before first pitch and grades that night, or a plain count. No scouting verdicts are ranked here — those live in the panels and carry their own sample sizes.
1Our bats highest board probability Sam Antonacci 69%, lowest Drew Romo 52% (16 points of spread across the nine). see the grid
3Pen posture Us: 3 threw 35+ last time. Detroit Tigers: no flags. see bullpens
Run environment board total 9.23, P(over 8.5) 53%. Clears its pre-registered floor only; not distinguishable from climatology, and carries a documented −0.29-run level bias.
Their bats highest board probability Eduardo Valencia 13%. see the grid
Air 85°F · 10 mph, across · air 5.1% thinner than a neutral sea-level night. Shown as conditions, not as an edge: this engine's weather layer measured a CRPS change of −0.003 on the runs backtest, which is not distinguishable from zero.
Jackson Jobe (RHP)limited 2026 sample
71 pitches, K% 25% overall (16 BF; split withheld, short side only 7 BF)
1 apps · median 16 BF · reaches the order 2.0× (max 2) · exit pitch count withheld, only 1 start(s). Fade is measured inside each start on nights that reached 85 pitches, so it is not flattered by the short outings.
League percentiles, starter pool
K%6925%
BB%816%
CSW%2425%
Whiff%4322%
Chase%9838%
xwOBA vs89.274
Hard-hit%6236%
GB%9964%
1st-pitch strike%·
published K forecast: E[K] 5.6
recent starts, K (n=1)
408/08 SF
Arsenal, shape and results
Pitch
#
vL%
vR%
MPH
IVB
HB
RPM
Whiff
CSW
Chase
2K use
2K zone
xwOBA
RV/100
4-seam
29
47%
34%
98.3
+17
-8
2430
24%
28%
44%
48%
·
·
·
slider
18
28%
23%
90.1
+1
+6
2789
18%
28%
·
24%
·
·
·
sinker
9
0%
26%
96.5
+7
-16
2399
·
22%
·
8%
·
·
·
changeup
8
17%
6%
85.8
+6
-15
1827
·
12%
·
12%
·
·
·
curveball
7
8%
11%
81.9
-14
+11
2874
·
29%
·
8%
·
·
·
RV/100 is run value per 100 pitches from the pitcher's
side, so negative is good (a curveball at −1.3 costs the
pitcher runs even if it misses bats — a real tension worth reading, not a
contradiction). Whiff, chase and xwOBA are computed on this pitcher's own
pitches this season; low-usage pitches carry small samples.
Locations, catcher view
4-seamslidersinker
Movement
How to attack
Vs righties he leans sinker (26% of pitches to that side).
Hunt the slider: 25% usage, only 18% whiffs, 44% in-zone (all counts).
Two strikes: expect the 4-seam (48% of 2-strike pitches vs 41% overall).
Sean Newcomb (LHP)
1016 pitches, K% 23% overall (263 BF; split withheld, short side only 114 BF)
Opener usage: in a typical outing he does not get through the order once (44 appearances, median 6 batters, deepest 2×). Prep the second and third look against the bullpen, not this arsenal — see Bullpens.
44 apps · median 6 BF · reaches the order 1.0× (max 2) · exit pitch count withheld, only 1 start(s). Fade is measured inside each start on nights that reached 85 pitches, so it is not flattered by the short outings.
League percentiles, starter pool
K%5123%
BB%628%
CSW%8730%
Whiff%4022%
Chase%1827%
xwOBA vs53.313
Hard-hit%6836%
GB%7848%
1st-pitch strike%5061%
recent starts, K (n=1) last start 06/20, 55 days ago
406/20 DET
Arsenal, shape and results
Pitch
#
vL%
vR%
MPH
IVB
HB
RPM
Whiff
CSW
Chase
2K use
2K zone
xwOBA
RV/100
4-seam
377
33%
40%
94.6
+14
+10
2268
29%
33%
30%
43%
52%
.250
-2.0
slurve
333
32%
34%
82.6
-5
-18
2845
28%
35%
27%
34%
40%
.268
-1.6
sinker
229
35%
15%
93.3
+4
+17
2264
7%
25%
24%
13%
49%
.421
+0.3
RV/100 is run value per 100 pitches from the pitcher's
side, so negative is good (a curveball at −1.3 costs the
pitcher runs even if it misses bats — a real tension worth reading, not a
contradiction). Whiff, chase and xwOBA are computed on this pitcher's own
pitches this season; low-usage pitches carry small samples.
Locations and movement (4 charts)
4-seamslurvesinker
Movement
Attack plan vs Detroit Tigers
Slurve: top breaking whiffs are Torres (38%), Dingler (34%).
Careful with McKinstry: 90% contact, 17% K rate vs LHP; pitch to contact at the edges.
White Sox bats vs Jackson Jobe
Season quality vs tonight's starter hand, percentile-colored vs league: red elite, paper average, blue poor. P columns are the engine's published board numbers for this game. Batting order as posted. 30d contact is the last-30-day contact rate minus the season rate; an arrow is drawn only when the move clears two standard errors of its own noise, and n is the recent swing count.
#
Batter
PA
xwOBA
K%
Chase%
Contact%
HH%
P(1+ hit)
P(1+ HR)
30d contact
1
Sam Antonacci (L)
314
.369
14%
21%
88%
39%
69%
10%
▲ +4% n181
2
Munetaka Murakami (L)
250
.400
31%
23%
60%
59%
66%
17%
≈ n186
3
Miguel Vargas (R)
355
.368
18%
22%
81%
41%
68%
14%
▼ -6% n200
4
Andrew Benintendi (L)
316
.324
22%
31%
74%
47%
56%
11%
≈ n129
5
Braden Montgomery (S)
153
.319
20%
29%
75%
40%
63%
10%
≈ n194
6
Colson Montgomery (L)
329
.304
35%
33%
64%
45%
62%
13%
≈ n191
7
Chase Meidroth (R)
344
.288
24%
27%
82%
32%
68%
12%
≈ n155
8
Tristan Peters (L)
312
.307
19%
33%
80%
33%
59%
10%
≈ n146
9
Drew Romo (S)
131
.230
27%
36%
70%
27%
52%
7%
≈ n92
Detroit Tigers bats, where our staff attacks
Whiff by pitch group vs our starter's hand. Blue cells are the attack zones. P columns are the published board numbers. Batting order as posted. 30d contact is the last-30-day contact rate minus the season rate; an arrow is drawn only when the move clears two standard errors of its own noise, and n is the recent swing count.
#
Batter
PA
FB whiff
BRK whiff
OFF whiff
xwOBA
Chase%
Contact%
1st-pitch swing
P(1+ hit)
P(1+ HR)
30d contact
1
Gleyber Torres (R)
79
12%
38%
19%
.391
13%
83%
·
65%
11%
≈ n165
2
Dillon Dingler (R)
147
9%
34%
29%
.322
36%
80%
28% n147
66%
12%
≈ n200
3
Kevin McGonigle (L)
152
10%
28%
36%
.287
20%
82%
30% n152
68%
9%
≈ n200
4
Eduardo Valencia (R)
21
29%
·
38%
.373
37%
69%
·
63%
13%
≈ n76
5
Colt Keith (L)
24
0%
·
·
.230
22%
76%
·
60%
9%
≈ n130
6
Spencer Torkelson (R)
131
13%
31%
46%
.326
21%
74%
25% n131
62%
12%
≈ n191
7
Zach McKinstry (L)
66
8%
15%
·
.316
21%
90%
·
62%
7%
≈ n131
8
Ben Malgeri (R)
38
11%
·
68%
.294
27%
72%
·
52%
8%
≈ n56
9
Max Clark (L)
17
5%
·
·
.366
24%
86%
·
64%
10%
·
Detroit Tigers hitters, one card each
One card per hitter: the published probabilities this engine grades tonight, his whiff shape by pitch group, and his season against this starter's hand with the sample stated. Times-through-order and leverage splits are deliberately absent — at a median 45 plate appearances the third-time-through number carries a standard error roughly three times the effect it would be claiming.
1
Gleyber Torres (R)
P(1+ hit) 65% · P(1+ HR) 11%
FB12%
BRK38%
OFF19%
vs LHP 0.391 xwOBA, K 19% (79 PA)
2
Dillon Dingler (R)
P(1+ hit) 66% · P(1+ HR) 12%
FB9%
BRK34%
OFF29%
vs LHP 0.322 xwOBA, K 25% (147 PA)
3
Kevin McGonigle (L)
P(1+ hit) 68% · P(1+ HR) 9%
FB10%
BRK28%
OFF36%
vs LHP 0.287 xwOBA, K 20% (152 PA)
4
Eduardo Valencia (R)
P(1+ hit) 63% · P(1+ HR) 13%
FB29%
BRK·
OFF38%
only 21 PA vs LHP — too few to split
5
Colt Keith (L)
P(1+ hit) 60% · P(1+ HR) 9%
FB0%
BRK·
OFF·
only 24 PA vs LHP — too few to split
6
Spencer Torkelson (R)
P(1+ hit) 62% · P(1+ HR) 12%
FB13%
BRK31%
OFF46%
vs LHP 0.326 xwOBA, K 27% (131 PA)
7
Zach McKinstry (L)
P(1+ hit) 62% · P(1+ HR) 7%
FB8%
BRK15%
OFF·
vs LHP 0.316 xwOBA, K 17% (66 PA)
8
Ben Malgeri (R)
P(1+ hit) 52% · P(1+ HR) 8%
FB11%
BRK·
OFF68%
only 38 PA vs LHP — too few to split
9
Max Clark (L)
P(1+ hit) 64% · P(1+ HR) 10%
FB5%
BRK·
OFF·
only 17 PA vs LHP — too few to split
Matchups: CWS hitters vs Jackson Jobe
Where this starter's actual usage meets each hitter's
measured holes and damage, on the same map. An edge is only reported
where the pitcher genuinely goes — a hole against a pitch he does not
throw is not a matchup — and only where the rate is measurably worse than
league for a typical hitter in that same spot. Every line carries its
sample size. Batter-versus-pitcher history is shown as trivia and
is not used in any of it: the samples that actually occur are
far too small to support a conclusion, and most public matchup content is
built on them anyway.
1. Sam Antonacci
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes middle and in — a spot he goes to often, 14% of his pitches — the batter does real damage: 0.461 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.335 league average in that spot. (26 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 69% to get a hit and 10% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
2. Munetaka Murakami
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes middle and in — a spot he goes to often, 14% of his pitches — the batter does real damage: 0.438 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.335 league average in that spot. (11 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 66% to get a hit and 17% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
3. Miguel Vargas
Not enough of a track record in the spots this pitcher uses to say anything useful. No verdict rather than a guess.
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 68% to get a hit and 14% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
4. Andrew Benintendi
Edge: batterWhen the ball goes up-middle — a spot he goes to often, 11% of his pitches — the batter does real damage: 0.407 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.333 league average in that spot. (18 balls in play.)
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 56% to get a hit and 11% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
5. Braden Montgomery
Not enough of a track record in the spots this pitcher uses to say anything useful. No verdict rather than a guess.
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 63% to get a hit and 10% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
6. Colson Montgomery
Not enough of a track record in the spots this pitcher uses to say anything useful. No verdict rather than a guess.
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 62% to get a hit and 13% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
7. Chase Meidroth
Not enough of a track record in the spots this pitcher uses to say anything useful. No verdict rather than a guess.
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 68% to get a hit and 12% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
8. Tristan Peters
Not enough of a track record in the spots this pitcher uses to say anything useful. No verdict rather than a guess.
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 59% to get a hit and 10% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
9. Drew Romo
Not enough of a track record in the spots this pitcher uses to say anything useful. No verdict rather than a guess.
Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 52% to get a hit and 7% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.
Detroit Tigers: the running game and the defense
Sprint speed says who can run; attempt rate says who
will. Rate is steals of second per time on first, shrunk toward the
league’s 5.3% at 21 opportunities, with the raw count beside
it. Verdict needs 15+ times on first. Sprint speed and Outs Above Average are
Baseball Savant leaderboard metrics — measured from tracking data we do
not have and did not compute.
Behind the plate: Drew Romo — runners went 31-for-41 against him (24% caught). That is mostly the pitcher: measured split-half reliability for a catcher’s own caught-stealing rate is +0.59, and the spread between catchers is smaller than the sampling noise. Read it as what happened, not as a rating.
#
Batter
Sprint
Steal rate
Threat
OAA
1
Gleyber Torres (R)
25.1 ft/s
0.8% (2/394)
holds
+1 2B
2
Dillon Dingler (R)
27.5 ft/s
0.3% (0/327)
holds
·
3
Kevin McGonigle (L)
28.2 ft/s
4.8% (11/233)
holds
+0 3B
4
Eduardo Valencia (R)
·
·
no read
·
5
Colt Keith (L)
28.2 ft/s
2.5% (7/298)
holds
+2 3B
6
Spencer Torkelson (R)
26.4 ft/s
1.0% (3/381)
holds
-11 1B
7
Zach McKinstry (L)
27.9 ft/s
8.5% (24/274)
occasional
+6 2B
8
Ben Malgeri (R)
28.9 ft/s
1.9% (0/39)
holds
·
9
Max Clark (L)
·
2.7% (0/21)
holds
·
Chicago White Sox: the running game and the defense
Sprint speed says who can run; attempt rate says who
will. Rate is steals of second per time on first, shrunk toward the
league’s 5.3% at 21 opportunities, with the raw count beside
it. Verdict needs 15+ times on first. Sprint speed and Outs Above Average are
Baseball Savant leaderboard metrics — measured from tracking data we do
not have and did not compute.
#
Batter
Sprint
Steal rate
Threat
OAA
1
Sam Antonacci (L)
28.2 ft/s
9.4% (16/162)
occasional
-5 LF
2
Munetaka Murakami (L)
27.1 ft/s
2.5% (3/146)
holds
+0 1B
3
Miguel Vargas (R)
28.3 ft/s
4.2% (14/342)
holds
-2 3B
4
Andrew Benintendi (L)
26.6 ft/s
0.8% (1/245)
holds
·
5
Braden Montgomery (S)
28.5 ft/s
2.3% (1/71)
holds
·
6
Colson Montgomery (L)
26.6 ft/s
0.9% (1/209)
holds
+6 SS
7
Chase Meidroth (R)
27.2 ft/s
3.3% (13/407)
holds
+4 2B
8
Tristan Peters (L)
28.7 ft/s
4.4% (5/117)
holds
+9 CF
9
Drew Romo (S)
26.1 ft/s
3.5% (1/39)
holds
·
Bullpens
Sorted by 30-day workload. Day cells show pitches on the three
most recent league game dates; dark means heavy recent use. Season rates
percentile-colored vs all pitchers with 150+ pitches.