Chicago White Sox at Kansas City Royals

2026-09-22, 7:40 PM ET, Kauffman Stadium. Anthony Kay (L) against Daniel Lynch IV (L). Every number derives from the public Statcast store and the engine's published boards. Charts are code-drawn. Probabilities, not picks. Statcast through 2026-09-21.

What decides tonight

Every number below is a probability this engine published before first pitch and grades that night, or a plain count. No scouting verdicts are ranked here — those live in the panels and carry their own sample sizes.

Daniel Lynch IV (LHP)

1146 pitches, K% 17% overall (312 BF; split withheld, short side only 114 BF)

Opener usage: in a typical outing he does not get through the order once (54 appearances, median 4 batters, deepest 3×). Prep the second and third look against the bullpen, not this arsenal — see Bullpens.

54 apps · median 4 BF · reaches the order 1.0× (max 3) · exits at 64 pitches (IQR 44–70, 8 starts). Fade is measured inside each start on nights that reached 85 pitches, so it is not flattered by the short outings.

League percentiles, starter pool

K%1317%
BB%677%
CSW%5027%
Whiff%4522%
Chase%5530%
xwOBA vs57.310
Hard-hit%5637%
GB%8148%
1st-pitch strike%755%
recent starts, K (n=5)
208/23
DET
308/29
CLE
009/04
TOR
309/09
AZ
309/16
HOU

Arsenal, shape and results

Pitch # vL%vR% MPHIVBHB RPMWhiffCSW Chase 2K use 2K zone xwOBA RV/100
sinker35953%20%94.0+10+16215913%29%27%18%46%.342-1.6
changeup2863%37%85.6+2+14152624%28%40%24%40%.296-1.4
slider22439%9%87.3+3-3229935%26%38%34%36%.231-3.0
4-seam1744%21%94.6+16+8229413%17%17%22%35%.421+3.1
knuckle-curve1032%13%81.7-2-3224423%34%25%2%·.262-1.4

RV/100 is run value per 100 pitches from the pitcher's side, so negative is good (a curveball at −1.3 costs the pitcher runs even if it misses bats — a real tension worth reading, not a contradiction). Whiff, chase and xwOBA are computed on this pitcher's own pitches this season; low-usage pitches carry small samples.

Locations, catcher view

sinker
changeup
slider

Movement

sinker: +10 IVB, +16 HBchangeup: +2 IVB, +14 HBslider: +3 IVB, -3 HB4-seam: +16 IVB, +8 HBknuckle-curve: -2 IVB, -3 HBhorizontal break (in), catcher viewinduced vertical break (in)

How to attack

  • Vs righties he leans changeup (37% of pitches to that side).
  • Hunt the sinker early: 37% of his first pitches, only 13% whiffs, 44% in-zone on 0-0.
  • Two strikes: expect the slider (34% of 2-strike pitches vs 20% overall).

Anthony Kay (LHP)

2649 pitches, K% 26% vs LHB (179 BF) / 15% vs RHB (492 BF)

31 apps · median 22 BF · reaches the order 3.0× (max 3) · exits at 89 pitches (IQR 83–92, 29 starts) · fastball -0.7 mph late (16 deep starts). Fade is measured inside each start on nights that reached 85 pitches, so it is not flattered by the short outings.

League percentiles, starter pool

K%2118%
BB%588%
CSW%2425%
Whiff%4222%
Chase%7232%
xwOBA vs20.342
Hard-hit%4539%
GB%5844%
1st-pitch strike%3259%
published K forecast: E[K] 4.3
recent starts, K (n=5)
408/25
TEX
508/31
HOU
309/05
MIN
209/11
STL
309/16
CLE

Arsenal, shape and results

Pitch # vL%vR% MPHIVBHB RPMWhiffCSW Chase 2K use 2K zone xwOBA RV/100
sweeper60630%20%82.7+0-13244333%34%23%16%32%.323+0.4
4-seam59016%24%95.9+15+7235117%24%33%26%43%.365+0.1
sinker46537%10%95.3+5+16226815%26%36%15%60%.349-0.4
cutter44310%19%91.7+7-1239316%22%31%10%30%.438+0.4
changeup3750%19%86.1+0+14174930%19%37%17%17%.254+1.0
slider1706%6%86.3-4-4256527%20%45%17%24%.280+2.2

RV/100 is run value per 100 pitches from the pitcher's side, so negative is good (a curveball at −1.3 costs the pitcher runs even if it misses bats — a real tension worth reading, not a contradiction). Whiff, chase and xwOBA are computed on this pitcher's own pitches this season; low-usage pitches carry small samples.

Locations and movement (4 charts)
sweeper
4-seam
sinker

Movement

sweeper: +0 IVB, -13 HB4-seam: +15 IVB, +7 HBsinker: +5 IVB, +16 HBcutter: +7 IVB, -1 HBchangeup: +0 IVB, +14 HBslider: -4 IVB, -4 HBhorizontal break (in), catcher viewinduced vertical break (in)

Attack plan vs Kansas City Royals

  • Sweeper/slider: top breaking whiffs are Massey (43%), Loftin (39%).
  • Careful with Garcia: 91% contact, 14% K rate vs LHP; pitch to contact at the edges.

White Sox bats vs Daniel Lynch IV

Season quality vs tonight's starter hand, percentile-colored vs league: red elite, paper average, blue poor. P columns are the engine's published board numbers for this game. Batting order as posted. 30d contact is the last-30-day contact rate minus the season rate; an arrow is drawn only when the move clears two standard errors of its own noise, and n is the recent swing count.

#BatterPAxwOBAK%Chase%Contact%HH%P(1+ hit)P(1+ HR)30d contact
1Miguel Vargas (R)201.42417%21%85%53%67%9%≈ n213
2Tommy Pham (R)21.30133%26%63%55%51%8%≈ n18
3Randal Grichuk (R)169.37122%36%82%54%65%12%≈ n111
4Munetaka Murakami (L)159.35436%20%61%59%58%10%≈ n224
5Chase Meidroth (R)179.34117%28%85%40%66%9%≈ n188
6Kyle Teel (L)33.30336%36%65%44%59%10%≈ n96
7Brenton Doyle (R)91.25631%37%68%40%48%10%≈ n89
8Colson Montgomery (L)188.32530%31%68%37%54%12%≈ n225
9Braden Montgomery (S)96.27229%35%69%36%56%7%≈ n202

Kansas City Royals bats, where our staff attacks

Whiff by pitch group vs our starter's hand. Blue cells are the attack zones. P columns are the published board numbers. Batting order as posted. 30d contact is the last-30-day contact rate minus the season rate; an arrow is drawn only when the move clears two standard errors of its own noise, and n is the recent swing count.

#BatterPAFB whiffBRK whiffOFF whiffxwOBAChase%Contact%1st-pitch swingP(1+ hit)P(1+ HR)30d contact
1Carter Jensen (L)16320%37%·.28220%73%31% n16367%16%≈ n172
2Bobby Witt Jr. (R)16219%23%24%.41937%79%25% n16267%11%≈ n219
3Jac Caglianone (L)16022%38%13%.29445%71%50% n16058%9%≈ n139
4Maikel Garcia (R)727%18%·.39022%91%·67%9%≈ n27
5Vinnie Pasquantino (L)12510%24%·.27532%83%41% n12567%15%≈ n177
6Salvador Perez (R)16920%24%19%.34247%79%39% n16964%11%≈ n208
7Michael Massey (L)9712%43%·.26634%75%·63%9%≈ n134
8Nick Loftin (R)1667%39%24%.31426%82%20% n16660%8%≈ n153
9Kyle Isbel (L)7510%21%·.23633%86%·54%7%≈ n132

Kansas City Royals hitters, one card each

One card per hitter: the published probabilities this engine grades tonight, his whiff shape by pitch group, and his season against this starter's hand with the sample stated. Times-through-order and leverage splits are deliberately absent — at a median 45 plate appearances the third-time-through number carries a standard error roughly three times the effect it would be claiming.

1

Carter Jensen (L)

P(1+ hit) 67% · P(1+ HR) 16%

FB20%
BRK37%
OFF·

vs LHP 0.282 xwOBA, K 31% (163 PA)

2

Bobby Witt Jr. (R)

P(1+ hit) 67% · P(1+ HR) 11%

FB19%
BRK23%
OFF24%

vs LHP 0.419 xwOBA, K 15% (162 PA)

3

Jac Caglianone (L)

P(1+ hit) 58% · P(1+ HR) 9%

FB22%
BRK38%
OFF13%

vs LHP 0.294 xwOBA, K 29% (160 PA)

4

Maikel Garcia (R)

P(1+ hit) 67% · P(1+ HR) 9%

FB7%
BRK18%
OFF·

vs LHP 0.390 xwOBA, K 14% (72 PA)

5

Vinnie Pasquantino (L)

P(1+ hit) 67% · P(1+ HR) 15%

FB10%
BRK24%
OFF·

vs LHP 0.275 xwOBA, K 20% (125 PA)

6

Salvador Perez (R)

P(1+ hit) 64% · P(1+ HR) 11%

FB20%
BRK24%
OFF19%

vs LHP 0.342 xwOBA, K 18% (169 PA)

7

Michael Massey (L)

P(1+ hit) 63% · P(1+ HR) 9%

FB12%
BRK43%
OFF·

vs LHP 0.266 xwOBA, K 23% (97 PA)

8

Nick Loftin (R)

P(1+ hit) 60% · P(1+ HR) 8%

FB7%
BRK39%
OFF24%

vs LHP 0.314 xwOBA, K 17% (166 PA)

9

Kyle Isbel (L)

P(1+ hit) 54% · P(1+ HR) 7%

FB10%
BRK21%
OFF·

vs LHP 0.236 xwOBA, K 21% (75 PA)

Matchups: CWS hitters vs Daniel Lynch IV

Where this starter's actual usage meets each hitter's measured holes and damage, on the same map. An edge is only reported where the pitcher genuinely goes — a hole against a pitch he does not throw is not a matchup — and only where the rate is measurably worse than league for a typical hitter in that same spot. Every line carries its sample size. Batter-versus-pitcher history is shown as trivia and is not used in any of it: the samples that actually occur are far too small to support a conclusion, and most public matchup content is built on them anyway.

1. Miguel Vargas

Edge: batterWhen the ball goes down and away — and he puts 7% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.519 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.261 league average in that spot. (14 balls in play.)

Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 67% to get a hit and 9% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.

1 for 2 lifetime. At 2 plate appearances this is trivia, not evidence — it is shown because people ask for it, and it is not used anywhere in the analysis above.

2. Tommy Pham

Not enough of a track record in the spots this pitcher uses to say anything useful. No verdict rather than a guess.

Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 51% to get a hit and 8% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.

3. Randal Grichuk

Edge: batterWhen the ball goes down and away — and he puts 7% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.578 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.261 league average in that spot. (18 balls in play.)

Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 65% to get a hit and 12% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.

0 for 1 lifetime. At 1 plate appearances this is trivia, not evidence — it is shown because people ask for it, and it is not used anywhere in the analysis above.

4. Munetaka Murakami

Not enough of a track record in the spots this pitcher uses to say anything useful. No verdict rather than a guess.

Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 58% to get a hit and 10% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.

0 for 1 lifetime. At 1 plate appearances this is trivia, not evidence — it is shown because people ask for it, and it is not used anywhere in the analysis above.

5. Chase Meidroth

Not enough of a track record in the spots this pitcher uses to say anything useful. No verdict rather than a guess.

Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 66% to get a hit and 9% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.

1 for 2 lifetime. At 2 plate appearances this is trivia, not evidence — it is shown because people ask for it, and it is not used anywhere in the analysis above.

6. Kyle Teel

Not enough of a track record in the spots this pitcher uses to say anything useful. No verdict rather than a guess.

Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 59% to get a hit and 10% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.

1 for 1 lifetime. At 1 plate appearances this is trivia, not evidence — it is shown because people ask for it, and it is not used anywhere in the analysis above.

7. Brenton Doyle

Edge: batterWhen the ball goes down-middle — and he puts 8% of his pitches there — the batter does real damage: 0.418 expected value per ball in play, against a 0.355 league average in that spot. (13 balls in play.)

Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 48% to get a hit and 10% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.

8. Colson Montgomery

Edge: pitcherHe throws the sinker off the plate on 25% of his pitches to this side. The batter swings and misses 39% of the time there, against 22% for a typical hitter — +17 points. (37 swings.)

Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 54% to get a hit and 12% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.

1 for 3 lifetime. At 3 plate appearances this is trivia, not evidence — it is shown because people ask for it, and it is not used anywhere in the analysis above.

9. Braden Montgomery

Not enough of a track record in the spots this pitcher uses to say anything useful. No verdict rather than a guess.

Tonight's published, gradeable numbers for this batter: 56% to get a hit and 7% to homer. Those are what the record grades — the notes above only explain why.

1 for 1 lifetime. At 1 plate appearances this is trivia, not evidence — it is shown because people ask for it, and it is not used anywhere in the analysis above.

Kansas City Royals: the running game and the defense

Sprint speed says who can run; attempt rate says who will. Rate is steals of second per time on first, shrunk toward the league’s 5.3% at 22 opportunities, with the raw count beside it. Verdict needs 15+ times on first. Sprint speed and Outs Above Average are Baseball Savant leaderboard metrics — measured from tracking data we do not have and did not compute.

Behind the plate: Kyle Teel — runners went 49-for-62 against him (21% caught). That is mostly the pitcher: measured split-half reliability for a catcher’s own caught-stealing rate is +0.59, and the spread between catchers is smaller than the sampling noise. Read it as what happened, not as a rating.

#Batter Sprint Steal rate Threat OAA
1Carter Jensen (L)27.8 ft/s0.9% (1/205)holds·
2Bobby Witt Jr. (R)30.3 ft/s16.3% (77/459)runner+18 SS
3Jac Caglianone (L)27.0 ft/s3.9% (8/215)holds-4 RF
4Maikel Garcia (R)27.7 ft/s7.7% (26/329)occasional+6 3B
5Vinnie Pasquantino (L)25.8 ft/s1.3% (4/370)holds+0 1B
6Salvador Perez (R)24.0 ft/s0.6% (1/323)holds·
7Michael Massey (L)27.0 ft/s1.9% (3/197)holds+8 2B
8Nick Loftin (R)28.2 ft/s3.6% (6/174)holds-6 3B
9Kyle Isbel (L)27.4 ft/s4.2% (9/217)holds+4 CF

Chicago White Sox: the running game and the defense

Sprint speed says who can run; attempt rate says who will. Rate is steals of second per time on first, shrunk toward the league’s 5.3% at 22 opportunities, with the raw count beside it. Verdict needs 15+ times on first. Sprint speed and Outs Above Average are Baseball Savant leaderboard metrics — measured from tracking data we do not have and did not compute.

#Batter Sprint Steal rate Threat OAA
1Miguel Vargas (R)28.3 ft/s5.0% (21/420)holds-2 3B
2Tommy Pham (R)·2.0% (3/182)holds·
3Randal Grichuk (R)27.3 ft/s1.4% (1/130)holds·
4Munetaka Murakami (L)27.1 ft/s1.9% (3/201)holds+0 1B
5Chase Meidroth (R)27.2 ft/s3.4% (15/456)holds+4 2B
6Kyle Teel (L)27.0 ft/s1.6% (2/174)holds·
7Brenton Doyle (R)28.7 ft/s13.3% (33/234)runner·
8Colson Montgomery (L)26.6 ft/s0.8% (1/243)holds+6 SS
9Braden Montgomery (S)28.5 ft/s1.5% (1/117)holds·

Bullpens

Sorted by 30-day workload. Day cells show pitches on the three most recent league game dates; dark means heavy recent use. Season rates percentile-colored vs all pitchers with 150+ pitches.

White Sox bullpen 8 arms
Reliever09/1809/1909/20 games since 30-day K%Whiff%xwOBA Top pitches
Trevor Richards (R)19·32today304p/11g21%20%.3124-seam 91 (62%) · changeup 79 (22%)
Hagen Smith (L)20·18today277p/10g38%37%.2504-seam 94 (47%) · slider 83 (32%)
Grant Taylor (R)·23·1245p/10g31%26%.2744-seam 98 (30%) · curveball 84 (26%)
Sean Newcomb (L)24··2230p/7g22%20%.3224-seam 95 (47%) · slurve 84 (22%)
Tyler Schweitzer (L)···9178p/6g12%19%.367slider 88 (41%) · 4-seam 93 (34%)
Jordan Hicks (R)23··2152p/8g29%25%.274sinker 100 (37%) · 4-seam 99 (34%)
Bryan Hudson (L)14··2125p/10g22%21%.2844-seam 91 (65%) · sweeper 78 (35%)
Tyler Davis (R)···1276p/5g21%21%.2944-seam 96 (64%) · slider 89 (29%)
Kansas City Royals bullpen 8 arms
Reliever09/1809/1909/20 games since 30-day K%Whiff%xwOBA Top pitches
Nate Pearson (R)28·25today226p/12g21%21%.3204-seam 98 (47%) · slider 90 (23%)
Connor Thomas (L)20·26today195p/12g16%20%.334sinker 92 (23%) · changeup 86 (19%)
Jose Cuas (R)··7today174p/11g25%25%.339sinker 92 (43%) · sweeper 83 (28%)
Alex Lange (R)···3158p/8g22%27%.346slider 88 (35%) · changeup 91 (20%)
Steven Cruz (R)·17·1149p/9g26%26%.3164-seam 99 (55%) · cutter 94 (32%)
Craig Kimbrel (R)···4146p/9g20%21%.3214-seam 94 (56%) · sinker 94 (14%)
Anthony Gose (L)22·6today141p/11g11%24%.2874-seam 96 (62%) · slider 85 (31%)
Nolan Hoffman (R)·95today B2B96p/8g14%12%.342sinker 93 (32%) · cutter 89 (21%)